Nineteenth-Century British Women's Education, 1840-1900
Edited by Susan Hamilton; Janice Schroeder
- Published: 29 Aug 2007
- DOI: 10.4324/9780415376396
- Set ISBN: 978-0-41537-639-6
Set Contents
- Nineteenth-Century British Women’s Education, 1840–1900: Introduction
- Volume 1. Emily Davies and the Higher Education of Women
- Volume 2. Girl's and Women's Education: Arguments and Experiences
- Volume 3. Education of Working Women and of Middle Class Girls
- Volume 4. Higher Education for Women
- Volume 5. Women as Educators: Dorothea Beale, Frances Mary Buss, Maria Grey and Emily Shirreff
- Volume 6. Women as Educators: Arguments and Experiences
Higher Education for Women
- Edited by
- Susan Hamilton
- Janice Schroeder
Volume Contents
-
Front Matter
-
Women and Universities
-
56‘Plan of a Female College for the Help of the Rich and the Poor’, Lectures to Ladies on Practical Subjects, F. D. Maurice (Ed.), (Cambridge: Macmillan, 1855), pp. 1–25. By F. D. Maurice
-
57‘The Influence of University Degrees on the Education of Women’, Victoria Magazine, 1, (1863), pp. 260–71.
-
58‘The University of London and the Graduation of Women’, English Woman’s Journal, 11, (1863), pp. 270–5. By A Member of Convocation
-
59‘The Education of Women and How it Would be Affected by University Examinations’, Essays on the Pursuits of Women, (London: Emily Faithfull, 1863), pp. 216–39. By F. P. Cobber
-
60‘The Proposed College for Women’, Englishwoman’s Review, 2, (1869), pp. 176–81.
-
61‘A New College for Women’, Macmillan’s Magazine, 18, (1868), pp. 168–75. By Rev. J. Llewelyn Davies; J. Llewelyn Davies
-
62‘The Teaching of Science’, Woman’s Work and Woman’s Culture, Josephine Butler (Ed.), (London: Macmillan, 1869), pp. 121–51. By James Stuart
-
63‘The Medical Education of Women’, National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, (1873), pp. 385–93. By Sophia Jex-Blake
-
64‘A Conservative Plea for the Higher Education of Women’, Victoria Magazine, 23, (1874), pp. 434–62. By J. B. Mayor
-
65‘The Education of Girls: Their Admissibility to Universities’, Westminster Review, 109, (1878), pp. 56–90.
-
66‘How may the Higher Education of Women be Most Efficiently Advanced in Ireland?’, National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, (1881), pp. 413–33. By Mrs Byers; Helen Blackburn
-
67‘The Use of Higher Education to Women: Address to the Students of Bedford College’, Contemporary Review, 50, (1886), pp. 719–27. By Millicent Garrett Fawcett
-
68‘The Higher Education of Women’, Westminster Review, 129, (1888), pp. 152–62.
-
69‘Women and the Universities’, Contemporary Review, 58, (1890), pp. 240–55. By J. G. Fitch
-
70‘Against Oxford Degrees for Women’, Fortnightly Review, 64, (1895), pp. 89–100. By Thomas Case
-
71‘Degrees for Women at Oxford’, Contemporary Review, 69, (1896), pp. 347–56. By Millicent Garrett Fawcett
-
72‘Degrees for Women at Cambridge’, Fortnightly Review, 117, (1897), pp. 716–27. By J. R. Tanner
-
73‘The Women at Oxford and Cambridge’, Quarterly Review, 186, (1897), pp. 529–51. By Percy Gardner
-
-
Sex and Mind in Education
-
74‘Why Boys are Cleverer than Girls’, English Woman’s Journal, 2, (1858), pp. 116–18.
-
75‘Is There Any Specific Distinction Between Male and Female Intellect?’, Englishwoman’s Review, 2, (1868), pp. 483–91. By Lydia E. Becker
-
76‘The Equality of Women: Miss Becker’s Paper Read Before the British Association for the Advancement of Science’, Englishwoman’s Review, 2, (1868), pp. 48–55. By Lydia E. Becker
-
77‘On the Separation of the Sexes in Education’, Victoria Magazine, 14, (1869), pp. 145–60. By Whately Cooke Taylor
-
78‘On the Study of Science by Women’, Contemporary Review, 10, (1869), pp. 386–404. By Lydia E. Becker
-
79‘Sex and Mind in Education’, Fortnightly Review, 21, (1874), pp. 466–83. By Henry Maudsley
-
80‘Sex in Mind and Education: A Reply’, Fortnightly Review, 21, (1874), pp. 582–94. By Elizabeth Garrett
-
81‘What may be the Dangers of Educational Overwork for both Sexes, with Special Reference to the Higher Classes of Girls’ Schools, and the Effects of Competitive Examinations?’, National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, (1880), pp. 420–54. By Alexander M. D. Keiller; Miss Edith Pechey
-